ArticlePulmonary circulation2026
Global Resource Disparities Between Pulmonary Hypertension Centers: Results From the International Survey by the PVRI IDDI Access to Care Workstream.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a limited understanding of how pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients are managed worldwide. The Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute (PVRI) Innovative Drug Discovery Initiative (IDDI) global survey attempted to obtain insights into access to PH care in diverse international regions to pave future action plans. Responses from 151 centers (19.9% from Europe, 3.9% Middle East, 6% South Asia, 17.9% East Asia, 2% Sub-Saharan Africa, 31.8% Latin America, and 18.5% North America) were received. Most respondents had access to electrocardiography, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization but less availability to pulmonary function tests, ventilation/perfusion scans, and genetic testing. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors were available in almost all centers but there was limited access to oral, inhaled, and parenteral prostacyclin therapy, riociguat, and selexipag. Cluster analysis of middle-high- and high income countries demonstrated significant variability in PH care delivery and disparities in therapeutic resources across the three clusters. The most common limitations identified that contribute to delayed PH diagnosis were insufficient financial resources, insufficient staff, and limited time. Survey respondents requested access to webinars with content experts (45%), access to content experts for consultation and review of complex cases via video chat (55%), resources to attend a conference (67.5%), and provision of a mentorship program (33.1%) along with greater availability of medications, remote conference access, clinical trial availability, and increased advocacy for patients. Survey results suggest significant disparities across the globe. Further research is needed to understand access to PH care and therapies in non-expert/academic centers and regional disparities within countries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.