Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41510123›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals genomic differences between male and female breast cancer.

Jiyuan Zhu, Shanshan Xu, Wei Hua, Mengdi Wang, Shichao Zhang, Pengtian Lu, He Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiyuan ZhuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shanshan XuInstitute of Animal Husbandry, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Wei HuaDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Mengdi WangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shichao ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Pengtian LuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
He WuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Compared with female breast cancer (FBC), male breast cancer (MBC) is often detected at the advanced stage and has a poorer prognosis. Due to the limited research data on MBC, its clinical diagnosis and treatment regimens are mainly based on FBC, although these regimens may not be appropriate for MBC patients. This study aimed to investigate the similarities and differences between MBC and FBC at the genetic level, in order to provide ideas and basis for the diagnosis and treatment of MBC. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we conducted high-throughput sequencing on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples obtained from a cohort of 12 MBC and 14 FBC patients. Utilizing bioinformatics tools, we meticulously analyzed and compared the genomic profiles to elucidate the underlying genetic distinctions between MBC and FBC. Results: In our study, Conclusions: We concluded that MBC and FBC exhibit both genomic similarities and distinctions in our study. In the context of precision medicine, this study may provide new ideas and a basis for the diagnosis and treatment of MBC.

Indexed as

genomicMale breast cancer (MBC)mutationprecision medicinetargeted next-generation sequencing (targeted NGS)

Identifiers

PMID41510123
PMCPMC12776197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.