ReviewTranslational cancer research2025
An updated review on systemic therapy for brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain metastases (BrM) are a frequent and devastating complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), affecting up to 40% of patients during their disease course. Historically, treatment relied primarily on surgery and radiation, as systemic therapies were thought to have limited activity in the central nervous system (CNS). However, over the past two decades, the development of more targeted therapies has transformed the treatment landscape. Many of these newer agents have improved CNS penetration, which may offer patients the possibility of deferring or reducing the need for local therapies and their associated toxicities. Despite these advances, many challenges remain. There is still a lack of consistent inclusion of BrM patients in clinical trials, and when they are included, there are inconsistencies in measuring radiographic responses as well as in standardized CNS-specific endpoints, making it difficult to compare outcomes across therapies. As treatment options expand, the integration of systemic therapies with surgery and radiation requires nuanced, multidisciplinary decision-making tailored to individual patients. In this review, we aim to summarize the current treatment landscape of pertinent therapies for BrM in NSCLC patients while highlighting the need for broadening inclusion of these patients and creating well-designed prospective studies that intentionally include patients with active and untreated BrM alongside rigorously assess intracranial outcomes. Such efforts will be critical to developing treatment plans in order to ultimately improve survival and quality of life for NSCLC patients with BrM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.