ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Diagnostic challenges and clinical management of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a retrospective case series study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a relatively rare mesenchymal tumor in clinical practice and is difficult to diagnose. At present, clinical reports on this disease are still relatively scattered. Especially for IMT occurring in special sites such as the nasal cavity, sacrum, and bladder, systematic reports on its clinical manifestations, treatment responses, and prognostic characteristics are still lacking. Case Description: This study retrospectively reported six patients with low-grade IMT diagnosed by pathology (three males and three females), aged 15 to 63 years (with an average age of 41.67 years). The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 2.0 to 9.5 cm (with an average of 4.4 cm), and the involved sites included the nasal cavity, upper limbs, chest wall, sacrum, and bladder. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were followed up for 13 to 33 months after the operation (with an average of 19.67 months). Among them, one patient with nasal IMT had local recurrence after the operation, one patient with sacral IMT was found to have multiple bone metastases throughout the body during the follow-up period, and no recurrence or metastasis was observed in the remaining four cases. Conclusions: IMT is a tumor with "low malignant potential" or "borderline" characteristics. It is neither a typical benign tumor nor a highly malignant cancer, but occupies an intermediate gray zone. It can occur at multiple sites in the body, most commonly in the lungs, and has been reported across all age groups. Through the analysis of six cases of IMT with unusual primary sites, this study found that even with low-grade pathological features, the tumor can still exhibit aggressive biological behavior, including postoperative recurrence and distant metastasis, when arising in atypical locations such as the sacrum or nasal cavity. This suggests that the clinical management of IMT should not rely solely on pathological grading but should also involve a comprehensive evaluation incorporating the tumor's location and size. This case series contributes to broadening the understanding of the clinical spectrum of IMT, enhances awareness of IMT in rare sites, and provides important clinical rationale for long-term systematic follow-up and monitoring for all patients with IMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.