ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Interpretable LASSO-Cox model: Hsp90α/albumin ratio predicts hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The heat shock protein (HSP)/albumin (ALB) ratio, which measures the levels of plasma Hsp90α to ALB, is believed to be a sensitive prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its prognostic value has not been clearly confirmed. The aim of our study was to assess the role of HSP/ALB as a prognostic factor in patients with HCC and further establish an interpretable predictive model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) value. Methods: A total of 1,340 HCC patients were enrolled in this study. We measured the levels of HSP/ALB in HCC patients within a week before treatment. Then, we established the HSP/ALB ratio and assessed its correlation with prognosis. Finally, we use LASSO-Cox regression to incorporate HSP/ALB into the prediction model for visualization and risk stratification. Results: The best cut-off value for HSP/ALB was determined to be 3.77 using the X-tile software. It was found that the median overall survival (mOS) of patients with HSP/ALB ≥3.77 (high) [8.3 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-9.3] was significantly lower than that of patients with HSP/ALB <3.77 (low) (38.7 months, 95% CI: 35.8-45). In the training cohort, the mOS of patients with HSP/ALB ≥3.77 was 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.8-8.9), and that of patients with HSP/ALB <3.77 was 36.1 months (95% CI: 28.4-39.8). In the validation cohort, the mOS of patients with HSP/ALB ≥3.77 was 7.1 months (95% CI: 4.9-9.0), and that of patients with HSP/ALB <3.77 was 36.2 months (95% CI: 31.6-43.7). The subgroup analysis included four groups: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone, TACE combined with operation, and radiotherapy (RT) group. The results showed that the patients with HSP/ALB <3.77 had longer mOS. We integrated HSP/ALB into the LASSO-Cox prediction model. Our findings showed that using HSP/ALB alone, the area under the curve (AUC) values for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 0.757, 0.731, and 0.713, respectively. However, after incorporating HSP/ALB into the prediction model based on LASSO-Cox regression, the AUC values for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 0.850, 0.842, and 0.810, respectively. Additionally, a nomogram was created based on this improved prediction model. Meanwhile, it was observed that the OS of the low-risk group significantly outperformed that of the medium-risk and high-risk groups. Finally, we ranked the importance of variables according to the SHAP value. Conclusions: The integration of HSP/ALB into the LASSO-Cox prediction model improves its predictive performance, indicating that HSP/ALB can serve as a reliable prognostic predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.