ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Development and validation of a circulating tumor DNA-based machine learning model for predicting immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of circulating tumor DNA in unresectable and advanced non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: from stratification to therapeutic guidance.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current biomarkers, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB), have limited predictive value for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Machine learning analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can enhance patient stratification via liquid biopsy genomic signatures. We aimed to build a support vector machine (SVM) model using baseline ctDNA to predict ICI benefit in advanced NSCLC. Methods: We trained an SVM model on pretreatment ctDNA whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from the OAK trial cohort (n=303) to predict durable clinical benefit (DCB): response or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select 41 predictive somatic mutations. Model performance was validated in the independent POPLAR trial cohort (n=97) and a regional multicenter cohort (n=41). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate predictive accuracy and survival outcomes. Results: The ctDNA-based SVM model achieved high accuracy across cohorts: area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.87 in OAK, 0.92 in POPLAR, and 0.83 in the local cohort. Patients classified as SVM-low (score >0.55) had significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) [12.80 Conclusions: Our ctDNA-based SVM model accurately predicts DCB and survival outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. By using a single baseline liquid biopsy, this model could streamline immunotherapy decision-making without requiring longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.