ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2025
Effects of pulsed and continuous ultrasound therapy on olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients.
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19 patients, with a pooled prevalence of up to 50%. This study investigated the efficacy of pulsed and continuous ultrasound treatment on olfactory disorders of these patients. Materials and Methods: Three groups of COVID-19 patients having anosmia were studied, each including 15 patients. Pulsed ultrasound and continuous ultrasound were used to evaluate their efficacy on anosmia recovery in two groups of patients. The patients were subjected to pulsed or continuous ultrasound intervention 10 times during two weeks (5 days per week). The control group received no intervention. The SIT (Smell Identification Test) was used to assess the severity of olfactory dysfunctions of all patients on days 0 and 14. Data analysis was done using MANCOVA test. Results: Totally 20 (44.4%) and 25 (55.6%) patients were affected by Delta and Omicron variants of COVID-19 virus. The SIT test results showed a significant improvement in olfactory recovery of all 30 patients except one after ultrasound treatment (p < 0.05), but this was not observed in the control group. Pulsed and continuous ultrasound treatment showed an almost equal effect on olfaction status. Conclusion: Although there was no difference in olfactory test results in the control group during intervention period, pulsed and continuous ultrasound interventions were significantly effective in improving patients' olfaction. Pulsed and continuous therapeutic ultrasound improved the COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction and can be considered as a promising technique for postinfectious olfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.