ReviewProgress in rehabilitation medicine2026
A Systematic Review of Digital Health for Non-older Adults with Risk of Sarcopenia.
Review in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Non-older adults are at risk of developing sarcopenia, and exercise and increased physical activity are effective preventive interventions. Digital interventions, including gamification, may enhance the effects of exercise interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of digital health interventions on muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of digital health interventions on outcomes related to sarcopenia. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, and CENTRAL databases. Risk of bias was assessed according to established guidelines, and meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: In total, 28 studies were analyzed. The pooled results indicated that digital health interventions led to improvements in grip strength, performance in the chair-stand test, walking speed, Dynamic Gait Index, and Timed Up-and-Go test. In contrast, lower limb muscle strength and lean body mass did not show meaningful improvements. Although no major risks of bias were identified, the strength of the evidence remained limited because of the small number of studies and participants included. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that digital health interventions may lead to modest improvements in muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function in non-older adults at risk of sarcopenia, although the current evidence remains inconclusive. Further studies are needed to establish their effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.