ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The commonest multifactorial disease affecting mankind is dental caries. Oral pediatric liquid medications (PLMs) are the best line of treatment for young children, as they are available in the form of syrups, suspensions, and solutions. Extended use of liquid medicines has a deleterious effect on dentition in chronic asthmatic patients, sensitive respiratory problems, and epileptic patients, along with frequent sudden conditions such as sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, tonsillitis, and otitis media, and has a deleterious effect on the dentition of young adults. Materials and methods: The study was performed in three phases on two antiasthmatic and two antiepileptic liquid medications. Phase I: cariogenic potential of the selected PLMs was assessed using endogenous pH determination, determination of total sugar, and Results: Cariogenic and erosive potential was statistically significant in group B (antiasthmatic-omnacortil) and group C (antiepileptic-valparin). Conclusion: Individually, it would be feasible to educate youngsters and their parents about the importance of brushing their pearly whites after every medicine they take. On the contrary, producing medicines for kids without fermentable carbohydrates at minimal expense would be a desirable health improvement strategy. How to cite this article: Ghosh R, Dhinsa K, Rai A,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.