ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Chemotherapy tolerance and continuity are prognostic for overall survival in patients with localized and advanced biliary tract cancer.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens in Resected Biliary Tract Cancers: National, Comparative, Observational Study (TOG/GI-SAFRADJU-2501).International journal of cancer · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are relatively rare and have a poor prognosis in both localized and metastatic settings. Clinical trials tend to include patients who can tolerate treatments; however, chemotherapy eligibility, patterns, and survival may differ in the real world. The present study provides a 5-year overview of chemotherapy eligibility, patterns, tolerance, and survival in patients with resected and advanced BTCs. Materials and methods: Included in the study were patients with resectable or advanced BTC (excluding ampullary cancers) diagnosed between 2019 and 2024. The demographic/clinical characteristics, chemotherapy eligibility, patterns, and survival outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Results: Of the 151 patients included in the study, 61 (40.7%) had resected BTC and 90 (59.3%) had advanced BTC. Among the patients with resected BTC, only 52.5% received adjuvant chemotherapy, 38.7% needed dose reductions, and 29% could not complete the planned cycles. Median recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 24.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.4-58.0) and 59 months (95% CI: 38.4-59) in patients with resected BTC, respectively, for all patients. In a multivariable analysis, only the number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles was associated with OS [Hazard ratio (HR):0.63 (95% CI: 0.39-1.00), p=0.050]. Among the patients with advanced disease, 16.7% were not eligible for first-line chemotherapy, and 70.7% needed dose reduction. The median number of cycles was three (0-18); grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 52% of the patients; and median progression-free survival and OS were 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.3-5.0) and 9.4 months (95% CI: 5.9-13.7) for all patients, respectively. Only 36.7% were able to receive second-line treatment. The number of first-line chemotherapy cycles [HR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45-0.76), p < 0.001]/discontinuation due to toxicity [HR: 3.26 (95% CI: 1.34-7.93), p = 0.009], cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen [HR: 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.58), p<0.001], and receiving second-line chemotherapy [HR: 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11-0.68), p < 0.001] were significantly associated with OS in multivariable analyses. Conclusion: This study shows that a significant proportion of patients with BTC are not eligible or intolerant to chemotherapy in the real world. Maintaining the planned treatment, even with dose reduction, is associated with better OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.