ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Outcomes of the first adolescent-focused smoking cessation clinic in Türkiye on tobacco control.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Adolescent smoking remains common, highlighting the need to control tobacco use and identify influencing factors. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of an adolescent-focused smoking cessation clinic and the factors influencing them. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 262 adolescents, who, along with their parents, had direct access to the clinic. Data were drawn from patient records containing structured registration and follow-up documentation. The study investigated the effects of baseline cigarette consumption, sociodemographic characteristics, and nicotine patch use on smoking cessation rates at three months, six months, and one year. Results: The three-month, six-month, and one-year quit rates for adolescents were 18%, 14.3%, and 13.5%, respectively. The regression model revealed a positive association with three-month smoking cessation among those who had a cough (OR = 8.57; 95% CI: 1.83-40.11; p = 0.06) and those who used a nicotine patch (OR = 5.74; 95% CI: 2.06-15.94; p < 0.001). Additionally, individuals who used their pocket money to purchase cigarettes were more likely to quit smoking for three months (OR = 3.47; p = 0.038) and six months (OR = 9.26; p = 0.039). For every 10-cigarette increase in daily consumption, the likelihood of smoking cessation decreased at both 6 months (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 1.28-8.33; p = 0.014) and one year (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 1.39-10.42; p = 0.009). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that not receiving extra pocket money and smoking fewer cigarettes at the time of admission are associated with higher quit rates. Even short-term use of nicotine patches and addressing symptoms such as coughing may support adolescents' intention to quit. Adolescent smoking cessation clinics provide a valuable opportunity to address these factors in collaboration with families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.