Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509900›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Effects of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on overweight or obese college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Changzhou Chen, Chuanwen Yu, Sen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Changzhou ChenSchool of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Chuanwen YuSchool of Physical Education and Health, Heze University, Heze, Shandong, China.
Sen LiSchool of Physical Education and Health, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overweight and obesity are increasingly prevalent among college students, yet the comparative effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in this population remain unclear. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials evaluating the impacts of HIIT and MICT on body composition, lipid profiles, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight or obese college students. Twelve studies were included, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Low-to-very low-certainty evidence suggests that both HIIT and MICT may improve body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, and fat mass, while HIIT may offer additional benefits for cardiorespiratory fitness and select lipid markers. However, head-to-head comparisons revealed no consistent statistically significant differences between the two training modalities. Given the overall low certainty of evidence and methodological limitations across studies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. More rigorous, adequately powered trials are needed to clarify the relative effectiveness of HIIT and MICT for weight management and cardiometabolic health in young adults.

Indexed as

Human metabolismHuman physiology

Identifiers

PMID41509900
PMCPMC12775873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.