ArticleiScience2026
Effects of high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training on overweight or obese college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing four training modalities on body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiovascular responses in sedentary young men: a randomized trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Association Between Body Mass Index and Physical Fitness Among University Students in a Sub-Plateau Region of Gansu Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overweight and obesity are increasingly prevalent among college students, yet the comparative effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in this population remain unclear. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials evaluating the impacts of HIIT and MICT on body composition, lipid profiles, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight or obese college students. Twelve studies were included, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Low-to-very low-certainty evidence suggests that both HIIT and MICT may improve body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, and fat mass, while HIIT may offer additional benefits for cardiorespiratory fitness and select lipid markers. However, head-to-head comparisons revealed no consistent statistically significant differences between the two training modalities. Given the overall low certainty of evidence and methodological limitations across studies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. More rigorous, adequately powered trials are needed to clarify the relative effectiveness of HIIT and MICT for weight management and cardiometabolic health in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.