ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)2025
Multivariate mixed models accounting for don't know options in ordinal data.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivariate ordinal data characterised by between-subject heterogeneity or different response styles are prevalent in surveys and other observational studies. It is especially common in surveys designed to assess individual perceptions or knowledge to include a 'don't know' option on some or all survey questions. The latter makes the scales partially ordinal, which precludes the use of well-established models for ordinal data, whereas models for nominal data are inefficient and difficult to interpret. Ignoring the 'don't know' options may introduce bias as the subset of individuals who choose to provide ratings may not be representative of the population of interest. The suggested solution in this manuscript involves jointly modeling the selection of 'don't know' options and the ordinal ratings on multiple variables. The proposed multivariate mixed models are flexible, allow for heterogeneity in responses, response styles, and assessment of the effects of covariates on the ordinal ratings and on choosing the 'don't know' options. Likelihood-based inference and model comparisons are performed. Two case studies: one on financial risk perceptions and one on knowledge about the addictiveness of tobacco products are used for motivation and illustration. A simulation demonstrates that the proposed approach yields unbiased and efficient estimates. The results are straightforward to interpret, effectively capturing the complexity inherent in the data. This makes the proposed models particularly well-suited for analyzing partially ordinal ratings in social and behavioral surveys, providing a robust and reliable framework for such contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.