ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Full-endoscopic pedicle-based approach for resection of osteoid osteoma in the lumbar spine: a case report and review of current literature.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigation-Assisted Endoscopic Excision of Lumbar Vertebral Osteoid Osteoma: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoid osteoma (OO) of the spine is a rare benign tumor that can cause significant pain and radiculopathy, particularly when the lesion involves the posterior elements such as the pedicle. Although traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and open surgery are effective, they pose risks including neural injury and spinal instability. In recent years, full-endoscopic spine surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering precise lesion localization and resection while preserving spinal integrity. Case Description: We present the case of a 20-year-old female who reported a 6-month history of progressive low back pain and severe left-sided L5 radiculopathy. Imaging revealed a nidus in the left L5 pedicle consistent with OO. The lesion was successfully resected using a full-endoscopic pedicle-based approach with the RIWOspine system. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, allowing direct visualization and excision of the nidus. The patient experienced immediate symptom relief, and postoperative imaging confirmed complete resection. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of OO. At 1-year follow-up, she remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence or spinal instability. Conclusions: Full-endoscopic pedicle-based resection provides a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique for managing spinal OOs. This approach offers direct nidus visualization, preservation of spinal stability, and excellent clinical outcomes, supporting its utility as a preferred option in select cases. A literature review further supports its utility as a viable first-line surgical option, particularly in young patients with posterior element lesions. Future studies are needed to validate this technique in larger cohorts and to establish standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.