Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509857›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

Full-endoscopic pedicle-based approach for resection of osteoid osteoma in the lumbar spine: a case report and review of current literature.

Wongthawat Liawrungrueang, Watcharaporn Cholamjiak, Sompoom Sunpaweravong, Peem Sarasombath

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wongthawat LiawrungrueangDepartment of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-6569
Watcharaporn CholamjiakDepartment of Mathematics, School of Science, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-017X
Sompoom SunpaweravongFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5550-3995
Peem SarasombathDepartment of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-238X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteoid osteoma (OO) of the spine is a rare benign tumor that can cause significant pain and radiculopathy, particularly when the lesion involves the posterior elements such as the pedicle. Although traditional treatments like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and open surgery are effective, they pose risks including neural injury and spinal instability. In recent years, full-endoscopic spine surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering precise lesion localization and resection while preserving spinal integrity. Case Description: We present the case of a 20-year-old female who reported a 6-month history of progressive low back pain and severe left-sided L5 radiculopathy. Imaging revealed a nidus in the left L5 pedicle consistent with OO. The lesion was successfully resected using a full-endoscopic pedicle-based approach with the RIWOspine system. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guidance, allowing direct visualization and excision of the nidus. The patient experienced immediate symptom relief, and postoperative imaging confirmed complete resection. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of OO. At 1-year follow-up, she remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence or spinal instability. Conclusions: Full-endoscopic pedicle-based resection provides a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique for managing spinal OOs. This approach offers direct nidus visualization, preservation of spinal stability, and excellent clinical outcomes, supporting its utility as a preferred option in select cases. A literature review further supports its utility as a viable first-line surgical option, particularly in young patients with posterior element lesions. Future studies are needed to validate this technique in larger cohorts and to establish standardized protocols.

Indexed as

case reportfull-endoscopic surgerylumbar spineOsteoid osteoma (OO)pedicle-based approach

Identifiers

PMID41509857
PMCPMC12775615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.