Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509856›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025

The effects of postoperative activity restrictions on outcomes after spine surgery: a systematic review.

Kevin Mathew, Camille Flynn, Will Karakash, Henry Avetisian, Jeffrey C Wang, Justin M Lantz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin MathewDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2425-961X
Camille FlynnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Will KarakashDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0777-2539
Henry AvetisianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-7408
Jeffrey C WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Justin M LantzDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-3211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative activity restrictions are commonly prescribed after spine surgery. However, it is unclear whether postoperative restrictions improve clinical or surgical outcomes after spine surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery on patient-reported outcomes. The secondary aim of the study was to assess whether these postoperative activity restrictions were associated with recurrence (reherniation), adverse events, and complications after spine surgery. Methods: This review included studies discussing degenerative spine surgery patients with postoperative activity restrictions, defined as limitations on specific movements such as bending or twisting, or activities such as driving or weightlifting. Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science databases in November 2024. The Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, Version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) tools were used to evaluate included studies for risk of bias. Meta-analysis was initially planned but was not performed due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the certainty of the body of evidence. Results: A total of 3,723 studies were screened. Four studies met the inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial and two prospective single-arm cohort studies discussing open lumbar discectomy, and one prospective non-randomized two-group cohort study discussing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Notably, there are no studies discussing restrictions after cervical or thoracic spinal surgery. Pain, function/disability, and data on recurrence (reherniation), adverse events and complications were collected from each study. The certainty of evidence was low for all outcomes analyzed, making it difficult to provide a definitive conclusion for or against the use of postoperative activity restrictions in spine surgery. Conclusions: Current literature prevents a definitive conclusion regarding the effectiveness of postoperative restrictions in spine surgery. Future studies should address the limitations and heterogeneity of the current literature to provide the basis for standardized, evidence-based postoperative activity restriction protocols.

Indexed as

limitationsopen lumbar discectomypercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)Postsurgical precautions

Identifiers

PMID41509856
PMCPMC12775608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.