ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Brace yourself: routine postoperative bracing after adult spinal deformity surgery offers no clinical benefit and may increase harm.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can result in debilitating symptoms and often necessitates surgical intervention. Postoperative complications-including thromboembolic events, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), pseudoarthrosis, and rod fracture-are common and can severely impact outcomes. While spinal bracing is commonly employed postoperatively, its' clinical value remains unproven. The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, pain levels, and outcomes between patients who received thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) bracing and those who did not following ASD surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive ASD surgeries at our tertiary care center between 2016 and 2023. ASD surgery was defined as multilevel fusion involving at least 5 vertebral levels, extending from the pelvis to L2 or above. Surgical approaches included open or minimally invasive methods via different interbodies such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Nine surgeons participated in the cohort. Results: Of 265 patients, 193 (73%) received TLSO bracing postoperatively. Braced patients had a significantly increased risk of rhabdomyolysis [odds ratio (OR) =9.959; P<0.001] and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR =5.960; P=0.007). Long-term opioid use (≥12 months) was more common in braced patients (OR =3.895; P=0.002), and they reported higher postoperative back and leg pain (P<0.05). Bracing was not associated with a reduction in surgical complications, nor did it improve spinopelvic alignment outcomes. Conclusions: Routine bracing following ASD surgery does not reduce mechanical or surgical complications and may contribute to immobility-related morbidity and prolonged pain management. Forgoing postoperative bracing may improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. These findings support a reevaluation of routine bracing in ASD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.