ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2025
Surgical humidification (HumiGard™) improves tissue temperature during open spinal surgery: a first in-human randomised controlled trial.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Humidification (HumiGardGlobal spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tissue exposed to theatre air is susceptible to evaporative heat and moisture loss. The resulting local hypothermia and desiccation disrupts the internal milieu of the patient and may lead to delayed healing and increase the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). HumiGard for orthopaedic surgery was developed to deliver warmed, humidified air to an open surgical incision site to mitigate heat and moisture loss from an open wound. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of surgical humidification in preventing local tissue cooling and desiccation during open spinal procedures by delivering warmed, humidified air (37 ℃, 100% relative humidity) over the surgical site. Methods: Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective 1-2 level open spinal decompression were equally randomised to receive standard of care (Control) or HumiGard [n=8 for version 1 (V1), n=6 for version 2 (V2)]. The primary outcome was the temperature of the incision site measured at fifteen-minute intervals using a thermal camera. Results: Surgical wounds in open spinal surgeries cooled significantly, with an average temperature of 32.7±4.0 ℃ at 15 min post-incision and 28.5±0.9 ℃ at 90 min (P<0.01). Intra-operative application of HumiGard facilitated the maintenance of wound temperature near or within the normothermic range (~37 ℃), with an average of 35.4±3.9 (15-min) and 33.5±0.9 ℃ (90-min) with HumiGard V1 and 38.4±1.7 (15-min) and 36.8±1.5 ℃ (90-min) with HumiGard V2. At 15-min post-incision, the average wound temperature with HumiGard V2 was 5.7 ℃ higher than the Control group (P<0.001). This thermal advantage persisted throughout the procedure, resulting in a mean wound temperature difference of 8.3 ℃ compared to the Control group at 90-min (P=0.03). Supplementary observations by surgeons indicated that, with the use of HumiGard tissues appeared subjectively more hydrated, with improved redness, suggesting better preservation of tissue integrity throughout the procedure. Conclusions: This first in-human randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that a significant drop in local tissue temperature occurs in the surgical wound during open orthopaedic surgery. Intraoperative use of HumiGard mitigated this issue by delivering localised warmth and humidification, thereby maintaining physiological tissue temperatures throughout open orthopaedic procedures without disrupting the surgical workflow. Trial Registration: ANZCTR: ACTRN12620001321932; UTN: U1111-1257-0011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.