Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509811›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

The effect of a medication safety reminder letter for high-risk patients under a universal health insurance scheme- A pilot study.

Shou-Hsia Cheng, Yafang Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shou-Hsia ChengInstitute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yafang TsaiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Nudge interventions have been applied to change patients' health behavior in the areas of smoking cessation and healthy food choices. Patient activation is one of the key elements in the self-management of health. This study explored whether a medication safety reminder for high-risk patients can prompt doctors to reconcile patients' prescriptions and examine the role of patient activation. Study design: This was a cross-sectional study. Methods: This study selected eleven thousand subjects from the list of patients with duplicated medication in 2019 provided by the Taiwanese single-payer insurance scheme. Postal reminder letters were sent to the patients. After a month, questionnaires were sent out to ask patients whether they had consulted their doctors after receiving the medication reminder letter, and the doctors checked or revised their prescriptions. A total of 841 completed questionnaires were received, and 34.8 % of them had asked their doctors to check the prescription. Results: The results from regression models revealed that patients with higher patient activation had a higher rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.617) of asking their doctor to check the prescription (p < 0.001) compared with those with lower patient activation. Conclusions: The present study shows that nudging intervention by the health insurer to the patients can prompt individuals to request healthcare providers to check their prescriptions. This may reduce healthcare resource waste and increase care safety.

Indexed as

InformationMedication duplicationNudgingPatient activationTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID41509811
PMCPMC12775999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.