Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509801›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2026

Cost Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With and Without Intraoperative Cone-beam Computed Tomography: 18-month Postoperative Analysis.

Rosanne van Ee, Chris A Suijker, Antoinette D I van Asselt, Inge M van Oort, Riemer A Kingma, Stijn Roemeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosanne van EeDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chris A SuijkerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Antoinette D I van AsseltDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Inge M van OortDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Riemer A KingmaDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stijn RoemelingDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) increase the risk of stone-related events (SREs) such as reinterventions and emergency department (ED) visits. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) facilitates detection and removal of RFs to improve stone-free rates and potentially reduce SREs. To determine whether the initial increase in surgical costs for CBCT in a hybrid operating room (OR) is offset by a reduction in overall expenses by minimizing SREs, we compared the total in-hospital health care costs of standard PCNL versus CBCT-PCNL over an 18-mo period. Methods: Data from a previous randomized controlled trial including 80 patients undergoing CBCT-PCNL and 80 undergoing conventional PCNL were analyzed. Procedural costs were calculated by multiplying operative duration by the Dutch reference price per minute, and adding disposable costs. Follow-up costs included costs for complications, SREs (reinterventions, ED visits, drainage, admissions), imaging, and consultations during 18 mo. Key findings and limitations: Assuming utilization rates of 42% for a hybrid OR and 92% for a conventional OR and following reference prices, we calculated mean total costs per patient of €8725 for the CBCT group and €8564 for the control group, with a difference of €167. The 40.2% higher procedural costs for hybrid-OR PCNL were nearly offset by 38.3% lower follow-up, complication, and SRE costs. Limitations include the single-center design, incomplete cost standardization, and the exclusion of non-hospital costs such as productivity loss. Conclusions and clinical implications: While PCNL with CBCT in a hybrid OR increases operative costs, it lowers SREs and unplanned care expenses. Even at a significantly lower hybrid OR utilization rate, total health care costs remain comparable, so PCNL-CBCT can facilitate predictable resource use and efficient care, with potential benefits for patients and health care systems. Patient summary: A new technique using CT (computed tomography) scans during surgery may help in more complete extraction of kidney stone fragments. Our study shows that even though this procedure is more expensive, it reduces the need for postoperative appointments, scans, emergency department visits and additional operations.

Indexed as

Cost comparisonIntraoperative cone-beam computed tomographyPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRandomized controlled trialResidual fragmentsStone-related eventsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41509801
PMCPMC12775980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.