ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Cost Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With and Without Intraoperative Cone-beam Computed Tomography: 18-month Postoperative Analysis.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) increase the risk of stone-related events (SREs) such as reinterventions and emergency department (ED) visits. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) facilitates detection and removal of RFs to improve stone-free rates and potentially reduce SREs. To determine whether the initial increase in surgical costs for CBCT in a hybrid operating room (OR) is offset by a reduction in overall expenses by minimizing SREs, we compared the total in-hospital health care costs of standard PCNL versus CBCT-PCNL over an 18-mo period. Methods: Data from a previous randomized controlled trial including 80 patients undergoing CBCT-PCNL and 80 undergoing conventional PCNL were analyzed. Procedural costs were calculated by multiplying operative duration by the Dutch reference price per minute, and adding disposable costs. Follow-up costs included costs for complications, SREs (reinterventions, ED visits, drainage, admissions), imaging, and consultations during 18 mo. Key findings and limitations: Assuming utilization rates of 42% for a hybrid OR and 92% for a conventional OR and following reference prices, we calculated mean total costs per patient of €8725 for the CBCT group and €8564 for the control group, with a difference of €167. The 40.2% higher procedural costs for hybrid-OR PCNL were nearly offset by 38.3% lower follow-up, complication, and SRE costs. Limitations include the single-center design, incomplete cost standardization, and the exclusion of non-hospital costs such as productivity loss. Conclusions and clinical implications: While PCNL with CBCT in a hybrid OR increases operative costs, it lowers SREs and unplanned care expenses. Even at a significantly lower hybrid OR utilization rate, total health care costs remain comparable, so PCNL-CBCT can facilitate predictable resource use and efficient care, with potential benefits for patients and health care systems. Patient summary: A new technique using CT (computed tomography) scans during surgery may help in more complete extraction of kidney stone fragments. Our study shows that even though this procedure is more expensive, it reduces the need for postoperative appointments, scans, emergency department visits and additional operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.