ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the Clavicle: A Rare Orthopedic Entity.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological Spectrum and Management of Aneurysmal Bone Cysts in Atypical Anatomical Location: A Comprehensive Review of Demographics, Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clavicle neoplasms account for only 1.01% of bone tumors and the possibility of it being a primary aneurysmal bone cyst is incidentally low. Although rare in incidence, most of the cases reported were treated with en bloc resection either as a primary procedure or during recurrence. The rarity of the disease and the lack of medical literature poses a diagnostic dilemma for the treating orthopedic surgeon, radiologist, and pathologist, that could potentially lead to the lesions being diagnosed at a stage when options to salvage the bone can no longer be considered. In our case, early meticulous work-up, prompt surgical intervention, and strict follow-up enabled us to salvage the bone and, more importantly, preserve the acromioclavicular joint; hence, offering better functional outcome for the patient. Case Report: A 23-year-old female presented with complaints of pain in the left collarbone and restricted movement in the shoulder. Clinically, a bony irregularity was palpable over the left clavicle with associated tenderness. Patient was subjected to various radiological imaging and tissue sampling to aid in the establishment of a pre-operative diagnosis. A diagnostic dilemma arose as the investigations opened up a wide plethora of differentials. Considering the age of the patient and the provisional diagnosis of "giant cell lesion," an attempt was made to salvage the bone and preserve shoulder function. The patient underwent extended curettage, cancellous bone grafting, and augmentation plating. Intraoperative samples were sent for histopathology and the lesion turned out to be one among the least likely on the list of possible differential diagnosis - a primary aneurysmal bone cyst. A meticulous follow-up protocol was devised during which functional outcome was found to be excellent and there was no recurrence at 15 months. Conclusion: Through this case report, we would like to emphasize on the importance of broadening the spectrum of differential diagnosis while investigating tumors at a rare site. This was achieved by devising a meticulous pre-operative radiological and histopathological diagnostic protocol encompassing a spectrum of differential diagnosis. Establishing an early diagnosis gives us an option to opt for surgical interventions for bone salvage and, thus, achieve better functional outcome for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.