ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Ulnar Nerve Cross-sectional Area among Ulnar Neuropathy Patients and Healthy Subjects - A Study in Hospital-based Population of Eastern India.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound (US) examinations of the ulnar nerve and measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) are now used to diagnose cases of ulnar neuropathy. However, the CSA values vary across the population. The present study was planned to prepare a preliminary dataset of ulnar CSA among the symptomatic ulnar neuropathy patients diagnosed by electrodiagnostic studies at our institute and compare the values with those of healthy volunteers. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based case-control study was conducted, which included 20 diseased upper limbs diagnosed with ulnar neuropathy and 40 non-neuropathic upper limbs as controls. They all underwent an US examination of the ulnar nerve in both upper limbs. The demographic data, nerve CSA at five predetermined locations, swelling and flattening ratios were compared and analyzed. Results: The mean values of ulnar CSA at the medial epicondyle, 5 cm proximal and distal to it, at mid-forearm, and at the wrist were 11.5 ± 2.38 mm2, 7.43 ± 1.47 mm2, 6.17 ± 1.42 mm2, 5.78 ± 2.53 mm2, and 4.67 ± 2.3 mm2, respectively, in ulnar neuropathy patients. All the values were statistically significantly higher in cases than in controls. The swelling and flattening ratios were statistically significantly higher in ulnar neuropathy cases than in controls. Conclusion: This study presents a data set of ulnar nerve CSA and some other parameters for the ulnar neuropathy patients and the normative values of ulnar nerve CSA in healthy subjects for the population of West Bengal (Eastern India). This data might be helpful for the diagnosis and management of ulnar neuropathy in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.