ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Machine Learning Assisted Pre-operative planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Accuracy Validation and Post Operative Critical Analysis- A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Indian Perspective and Indigenous Innovation.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Machine learning (ML) applications in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) require systematic validation through prediction-verification methodologies to establish clinical utility and safety. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of 9 consecutive THA cases between March and September 2025. A hybrid ensemble ML system performed pre-operative templating using standardized radiographs with magnification correction. Predictions were systematically validated against actual intraoperative component selections through post-operative analysis. Primary outcomes included component-specific accuracy with descriptive statistics. Secondary outcomes included clinical safety and feasibility assessment. Results: The ML system achieved 85.7% overall templating accuracy across all cases. Component-specific accuracies were stem type 100% (9/9), stem sizing 88.9% (8/9), cup sizing 66.7% (6/9), head sizing 54.4% (5/9), and material selection 95.6% (9/9). High templating accuracy (≥97.7%) was achieved in 44.4% of cases (4/9). The system demonstrated conversion risk prediction capability in one case. Clinical outcomes showed a 100% success rate with zero complications and no reoperations at a mean of 17.2 ± 8.1 weeks of follow-up. Conclusion: ML-assisted pre-operative templating demonstrates feasibility for THA planning with encouraging accuracy results and excellent clinical safety. These findings support the potential for larger validation studies. The prediction-verification methodology provides a systematic framework for ML validation in orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.