Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509731›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025

Therapeutic Effect of Intralesional Corticosteroids in Comparison with Multiple Puncture Technique in Treatment of Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis.

Pranay Khandelwal, Prabhat Yadav, P Mohammad Azlam, Himansu Bhusan Naik, Sanjul Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pranay KhandelwalDepartment of Orthopeadics and joint replacement, Arthoplasty Unit, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Prabhat YadavDepartment of Orthopedics, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
P Mohammad AzlamDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Himansu Bhusan NaikDepartment of Orthopedics, Birsa Munda Government Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sanjul BansalDepartment of Orthopedics, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government Medical College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plantar fasciitis is a common condition characterized by pain at the heel, particularly in the morning with the first step out of bed and initial steps after a long break. Corticosteroids were the mainstay of treatment for plantar fasciitis, but now other modalities are being tried. One such modality is the multiple puncture technique. The present study aims to compare the efficacy of the multiple puncture technique and corticosteroid in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Materials and Methods: A total of 38 patients were included in the study. Diagnosis of plantar fasciitis was made clinically based on history and presence of medial calcaneal tenderness. In the corticosteroid group, a 5 mL sterile syringe was taken and 2 mL of 2% lignocaine solution was loaded, while in the multiple puncture technique, 4-5 pricks were made in the plantar fascia close to the area of degeneration. Results: Mean Visual Analog Scale score and mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved in both groups at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months follow-up. The improvement was found to be statistically significant in all three follow-ups (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Multiple puncture technique is a safe and effective modality of treatment for plantar fasciitis.

Indexed as

corticosteroidmultiple puncturePlantar fasciitis

Identifiers

PMID41509731
PMCPMC12778928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.