ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025
Prognostic Nutritional Index and Urea-albumin Ratio: Novel Mortality Predictors for Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Composite Metabolic, Inflammatory, and Nutritional Indices with Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Comparative Prognostic Accuracy of Objective Nutritional Indices in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- 30-day mortality prediction in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Incremental value of the prognostic nutritional index with ABC and Rockall scores.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- Hematologic and metabolic indices for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: a retrospective intensive care cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Sepsis is a major health problem that causes the death of the majority of those affected. Early determination of mortality is essential to provide timely and adequate interventions. We investigated the efficacy of various prognostic indicators for the prediction of mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) sepsis patients. Patients and methods: Sepsis patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital between March 15, 2023 and January 01, 2024, were included in this study. These were divided into two groups: Survivors and nonsurvivors. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the groups were compared and their efficacy in predicting mortality was investigated. Results: Of the 115 patients in our study, 58 (50.4%) were in the nonsurvivor group and 57 (49.6%) were in the survivor group. Among the 16 different prognostic indicators investigated, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was found to have the highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.612-0.786; Conclusion: Our study showed that PNI and UAR indicators, when used together, may be a useful tool in the assessment of mortality risk in ICU sepsis patients. How to cite this article: Damarsoy T, Gozdas HT, Yildiz I, Demirhan A. Prognostic Nutritional Index and Urea-albumin Ratio: Novel Mortality Predictors for Critically Ill Sepsis Patients*. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(12):996-1001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.