Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509697›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Comparison of Sodium, Potassium, Hemoglobin, and Glucose Levels by Blood Gas Analyzer and Hospital Laboratory Autoanalyzer in Emergency Department Settings: A Cross-sectional Study.

Geeta Mittal, Kanchan Gupta, Aarushi Kaushal, Ritvik Chauhan, Nishant Sharma, Karanjot Singh, Vasul Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geeta MittalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7422-4316
Kanchan GuptaDepartment of Pharmacology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-8937
Aarushi KaushalDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6048-4712
Ritvik ChauhanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-6188
Nishant SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4577-1724
Karanjot SinghDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7815-1795
Vasul JainDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1102-9631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In emergency department (ED) settings, accurate and timely measurement of biochemical parameters like sodium, potassium, hemoglobin (Hb), and glucose is critical for initiating appropriate interventions. These parameters can be measured by a hospital laboratory autoanalyzer (HLA) or a blood gas analyzer (BGA). Although BGAs, as compared to HLAs, are able to deliver rapid results at the point of care, their accuracy has been a subject of debate. Therefore, this study was designed to compare them and determine their interchangeability. Patients and methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in 1,000 adult patients in the Emergency Medicine Department. Both arterial sampling for blood gas analysis and venous sampling for laboratory analysis were taken simultaneously. The reliability between two measurements was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient indicated good to excellent reliability for all parameters: Sodium (ICC = 0.946, 95% CI: 0.790-0.976), potassium (ICC = 0.907, 95% CI: 0.769-0.951), Hb (ICC = 0.947, 95% CI: 0.938-0.953), and glucose (ICC = 0.967, 95% CI: 0.962-0.971). The Bland-Altman plot showed moderate to high agreement for sodium, potassium, and Hb levels, and the mean bias was within acceptable limits. Despite the excellent ICC and high correlation for glucose, the Bland-Altman analysis revealed a substantial bias (+6.19 mg/dL) and very wide LOA (-67.69 to +80.07 mg/dL), indicating poor agreement. Conclusion: We advocate the use of BGA for sodium, potassium, and Hb measurement in emergency settings for quick decision-making. However, glucose measurements from BGA require careful interpretation and should be supplemented with laboratory testing. How to cite this article: Mittal G, Gupta K, Kaushal A, Chauhan R, Sharma N, Singh K,

Indexed as

Blood gas analyzerBlood glucoseElectrolytesEmergency departmentHemoglobinHospital laboratory autoanalyzerPotassiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID41509697
PMCPMC12776849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.