ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Current Concepts in the Management of Achilles Tendon Injuries.
Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achilles tendon injuries are commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice. The Achilles tendon is prone to rupture, and this negatively imparts ambulation. The diagnosis is clinical. Treatment options have evolved from conservative to surgeries, however there is no consensus on the most superior option of treatment. This narrative review aims to highlight the evolution in clinical diagnosis and treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures and discuss the current evidence in the treatment with emphasis on outcome measures of each treatment modality. Relevant studies on Achilles tendon ruptures with emphasis on treatment options, their strengths and weaknesses were reviewed. The treatment of Achilles tendon rupture has evolved from conservative options to surgeries. The surgical options include open repair, percutaneous repair, endoscopic repair, and ultrasound-guided repair. However, there is still no consensus on the most superior option for treating Achilles tendon injuries. Each method has its pros and cons. Conservative treatment has the appeal of the absence of scars, low cost and shorter duration of hospital stay. However, ankle stiffness, and late return to work are important drawbacks. Open surgery has the advantage of early return to function and low re-intervention rates. Surgical scars, likelihood of infection and cost are major disadvantages. Appropriate patient selection guided by the severity of the injury, the age of the patient, pre-injury status, work demand for the patient, experience of the surgeon, available resources, local soft tissue condition, and the patient's preferences are key to successful outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.