ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Association of self-rated health and risk of incident atrial fibrillation: Findings from three cohorts.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Self-rated health (SRH) is easy to obtain and is known to be a good predictor for mortality and several comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, but its relation to atrial fibrillation (AF) is largely unknown. We determined the association of SRH with risk of developing AF. Methods: We conducted a pooled cohort analysis of participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) ( Results: Over a mean of 16±6, 9 ± 2, and 10±4 years of follow-up, 2340 (22.8 %), 1525 (3.5 %), and 879 (17.4 %) incident AF events occurred in ARIC, HUNT-3, and MESA respectively. Lower SRH categories were associated with higher AF risk in each cohort and in the pooled analysis: HR 1.11 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.20) for good SRH; and 1.40 (95 % CI, 1.26 to1.55) for fair or poor SRH compared to very good or excellent SRH. Conclusions: Worse SRH was independently associated with a higher risk of developing AF. SRH is an easily obtainable metric and may help to additionally identify individuals at higher risk for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.