ArticleHealth systems (Basingstoke, England)2025
Revolutionising health monitoring: IOT-Based system with machine learning classification.
Article in Health systems (Basingstoke, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the pursuit of revolutionising health monitoring, this study introduces an IoT-based smart health monitoring system coupled with a machine learning classification framework. This innovative system tracks five crucial health parameters - Temperature, SPO2, Glucose level, Pulse rate, and Heart rate - providing a comprehensive overview of an individual's health status in real-time. Leveraging these parameters, a dataset is constructed, facilitating the application of four distinct machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, and CN2 rule induction. Remarkably, the classification accuracy achieved by these models demonstrates their efficacy, with SVM scoring 0.859, Tree achieving 0.996, Random Forest attaining 0.984, and CN2 rule induction reaching 0.902, respectively. Notably, among these algorithms, the Tree model emerges as the most superior, showcasing its potential for effectively analysing this type of dataset and enhancing the performance of health monitoring systems. Further, ThingSpeak has been utilised as IoT platform within our health monitoring system that facilitates the seamless collection of real-time data from diverse medical devices such as heart rate monitors and glucose metres. With applications in healthcare, home monitoring, sports, fitness, and industrial safety, the system offers versatile solutions for proactive health management and improved well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.