Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509646›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2023

AlphaFold2 Model Refinement Using Structure Decoys.

Maytha Alshammari, Jing He, Willy Wriggers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decoys Reveal Multiple Basins of Attraction for Cryo-Electron-Microscopy Flexible Fitting.Computational structural bioinformatics : international workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, proceedings. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maytha AlshammariDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Jing HeDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Willy WriggersDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.

Funding

Multi-Resolution Docking Methods for Electron MicroscopyR01GM062968 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI WRIGGERS, WILLY R · 2001 to 2023
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AlphaFold2-predicted protein structures inform many modeling techniques in structural biology, including the interpretation of cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps. However, the accuracy of the AlphaFold2 prediction, the quality of the experimental cryo-EM data, and the reliability of the model's alignment with density may affect the accuracy of the interpretation. In this work, we explored a new refinement approach by generating unbiased structural decoys from the AlphaFold2 model via 3DRobot or elastic network model (ENM)-based ModeHunter. Our hope was that some of the decoys would resemble the true structure, and consequently, that the refinement problem could then be reduced to selecting the correct decoy from the decoy set that most closely resembles the experimental cryo-EM map. We explored a map/model pair from the structure of a lipid-preserved respiratory supercomplex, where AlphaFold2 previously struggled (TM-score: 0.52). In this specific case, we observed that the inherent bias of 3DRobot toward compact decoys limited the AlphaFold2 model enhancement (best decoy TM-score: 0.53), whereas ENM is capable of producing extended decoys that significantly improve the accuracy of the AlphaFold2 model (best decoy TM-score: 0.68).

Indexed as

3DRobotAlphaFold2DecoysElastic Network ModelProtein Structure Prediction

Identifiers

PMID41509646
PMCPMC12774665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.