Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509633›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics research and applications : ... international symposium, ISBRA ... proceedings. ISBRA (Conference)2024

A Data Set of Paired Structural Segments Between Protein Data Bank and AlphaFold DB for Medium-Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps: A Gap in Overall Structural Quality.

Thu Nguyen, Willy Wriggers, Jing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics research and applications : ... international symposium, ISBRA ... proceedings. ISBRA (Conference), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  3. Toward Modeling Protein Multimers by Combining AlphaFold 3 Predictions with Secondary Structures from Medium-Resolution Cryo-EM Maps.Computational structural bioinformatics : international workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, proceedings. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thu NguyenDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3436-4360
Willy WriggersDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5326-3152
Jing HeDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7249-4746

Funding

Multi-Resolution Docking Methods for Electron MicroscopyR01GM062968 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI WRIGGERS, WILLY R · 2001 to 2023
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent publication of the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AlphaFold DB) offers an opportunity to revisit and refine many existing structural models in computational biology. We tested the hypothesis that models determined from less-than-ideal cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data could benefit from more recent AlphaFold predictions. Ideally, atomic structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are directly solved from experimental densities with a resolution higher than 4 Å. However, medium-resolution (5-10 Å) cryo-EM maps are also increasingly deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), many of which have associated atomic models of varying quality. It is difficult to solve atomic structures from such medium-resolution maps directly, so modeling approaches often rely on the indirect fitting of known templates. Therefore, we hypothesize that early structural interpretations of medium-resolution cryo-EM maps in the EMDB could benefit from potentially more reliable AlphaFold models derived later after more structural templates become available in the PDB. To study the utility of AlphaFold-predicted models, we conducted systematic mapping between the PDB and AlphaFold DB for structures derived from medium-resolution cryo-EM density maps. A dataset of 918 nonredundant pairs of structural segments was established. Using MolProbity, a structural validation method, we observed a significant difference in the distributions of MolProbity scores between paired structural segments in the PDB and AlphaFold DB. The structural segments in the AlphaFold DB exhibit a unimodal distribution, with an average of 0.96 MolProbity score, which is better than the average (1.98) of their corresponding segments in the PDB. The MolProbity scores of structural segments in the PDB vary significantly more than those in the AlphaFold DB and exhibit a bimodal distribution with a longer tail, indicating a wider range of model quality owing to the diverse structure fitting and refinement strategies used in the past.

Indexed as

ProteinProtein StructureStructure Validation

Identifiers

PMID41509633
PMCPMC12774667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.