ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2025
The angiosome and woundosome concepts in guiding revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulcers-a narrative review.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Conceptual Wound-Oriented Reinterpretation of Perfusion Heterogeneity in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From Angiosome to Woundosome: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Personalized Revascularization in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tibial periosteal distraction as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for diabetic foot ulcers complicated by peripheral arterial disease/chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The angiosome concept, introduced by Taylor Methods: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 1990 to February 2025 using combinations of the terms "angiosome", "woundosome", "critical limb ischemia", "diabetic foot ulcer", "direct revascularization", and "indirect revascularization". After screening 480 records, 14 studies were included in our analysis. Data were extracted regarding study design, patient population, revascularization strategy, and outcomes (wound healing, limb salvage). Findings were narratively synthesized with respect to study methodology and limitations. Key Content and Findings: Most retrospective studies reported improved wound healing and limb salvage rates following angiosome-guided direct revascularization (DR), particularly when inline flow could be restored. However, comparable outcomes were observed with indirect revascularization (IR) in the presence of robust collateral circulation. Evidence for woundosome-guided revascularization remains limited but suggests that a perfusion-oriented, individualized strategy may be especially valuable in anatomically complex cases. Conclusions: Incorporating angiosome- and woundosome-based strategies in CLTI management may improve limb- and patient-related outcomes. The decision on which particular territory needs primary attention and how many vessels require revascularization largely depends on the patency of feeding arteries in the wound area. In the future, a standardized way to measure the intra- and post-procedural arterial flow to the wound would be necessary, to study the clinical applications of the mentioned strategies. Future studies should therefore prospectively validate woundosome-guided strategies and integrate standardized perfusion assessment tools to guide individualized treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.