ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents in South Korea: 3-year outcomes of the multicentre, randomised HOST-IDEA trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02601157 (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis - Coronary Intervention With Next Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Platforms and Abbreviated Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis - Coronary Intervention With Next Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Platforms and Abbreviated Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (HOST-IDEA) Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The HOST-IDEA trial demonstrated non-inferiority of 3-to-6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to 12-month DAPT for net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 1 year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We evaluated the long-term outcomes of abbreviated antiplatelet therapy following PCI with third-generation DES. Methods: In the open-label, adjudicator-blinded, multicentre, randomised HOST-IDEA trial, 2013 patients from 37 hospitals in South Korea were randomly allocated to 3-to-6-month (n = 1002) or 12-month (n = 1011) DAPT between January 2016 and May 2021. The primary outcome was NACE at 3 years, comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), stent thrombosis, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5). Major secondary outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF)-comprising cardiac death, TVMI, and CD-TLR-and major bleeding at 3 years. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of >1-year DAPT, patients event-free at 1 year were classified into >1-year and ≤1-year DAPT groups and matched using a propensity score. These 3-year clinical outcomes were prespecified in the published protocol as mandatory clinical follow-up. HOST-IDEA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02601157. Findings: At 3 years, clinical follow-up was completed in 955 patients (95.3%) and 966 patients (95.5%) in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 1095 days (IQR 1095-1095). The primary outcome occurred in 7.7% and 8.2% of patients in the 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT groups, respectively (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.69-1.29; Interpretation: 3-to-6-month and 12-month DAPT showed comparable 3-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with third-generation DES. However, extending DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with increased major bleeding without additional ischemic benefits. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and identify patient subsets who may benefit from extended DAPT. Funding: Biotronik Korea (Seongnam si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) and B. Braun Korea (Seoul, South Korea).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.