ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Effect of Tooth Abutment Height on Retention of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Cemented With Two Types of Cement: An In Vitro Study.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Tooth Abutment Height on Retention of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Cemented With Two Types of Cement: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statement of the Problem: Retention is still a primary concern in conservatively managing short clinical crowns (SCC) and minimal restorative space. In modern dentistry, there is a growing expectation for the durability and retention of indirect restorations, along with a high esthetic demand, even in unfavorable underlying conditions. Purpose: This study aims to establish a reliable approach for the conservative treatment of SCCs using monolithic zirconia crowns (MZC). Materials and Methods: Sixty human molars were collected and mounted in resin blocks. The teeth were prepared with two different abutment heights (2 and 4 mm). MZCs with buccal and lingual projections were designed and milled after digital scanning. Half of the restorations were cemented with TheraCem (TC) calcium silicate-based self-adhesive resin cement, while the remaining half were cemented with glass ionomer (GI) cement. The specimens underwent thermocycling and cyclic loading. A traction test was then performed in the universal testing machine to evaluate the debonding forces. Data was analyzed using Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA tests. Results: A strong positive correlation was shown in Pearson analysis between the assigned group and the pull-out force ( Conclusions: We demonstrated the significant influence of TC cement on the pull-out force measurement, outperforming the GI cement. The abutment height also showed a smaller contribution to the force measurement. Low-thickness monolithic zirconia restorations cemented with self-adhesive resin cement can be recommended as a reliable and effective treatment option for clinicians managing cases with SCCs and compromised retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.