ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
The Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Osteomyelitis and Reactive Bone Marrow Edema in Diabetic Patients.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in distinguishing osteomyelitis from reactive bone marrow edema (RBME). Methods: This cross-sectional study included three groups of consecutive patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) presenting with osteomyelitis, RBME, or healthy bone. All patients had DFU and were referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with a history of foot surgery or biopsy before MRI, those who received antibiotic therapy for three or more days before imaging, and those with contraindications to MRI were excluded from the study. Osteomyelitis was confirmed by tissue biopsy, whereas RBME was diagnosed by exclusion. All participants underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and ADC values were measured independently by two radiologists who were blinded to the clinical diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of ADC was then assessed. Results: A total of 45 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) were recruited, of whom 18 (40.0%) had osteomyelitis, 16 (35.6%) had reactive bone marrow edema (RBME), and 11 (24.4%) had healthy bone tissue. Osteomyelitis demonstrated significantly higher ADC values compared to normal bone (P < 0.001) and significantly lower ADC values compared to RBME (P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of 1478.0 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, ADC differentiated osteomyelitis from RBME with an accuracy of 88.2%, sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 81.2%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958. Conclusion: These findings support the applicability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a non-invasive and accurate diagnostic tool for differentiating osteomyelitis from reactive bone marrow edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.