Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509599›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025

The Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Osteomyelitis and Reactive Bone Marrow Edema in Diabetic Patients.

Seyedeh Hanie Afzalabadi, Farrokh Seilanian Toosi, Ghasem Zamani, Alireza Mousavian, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Behzad Aminzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyedeh Hanie AfzalabadiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Farrokh Seilanian ToosiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ghasem ZamaniOrthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Alireza MousavianOrthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Amir Mahmoud AhmadzadehDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Behzad AminzadehDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in distinguishing osteomyelitis from reactive bone marrow edema (RBME). Methods: This cross-sectional study included three groups of consecutive patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) presenting with osteomyelitis, RBME, or healthy bone. All patients had DFU and were referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with a history of foot surgery or biopsy before MRI, those who received antibiotic therapy for three or more days before imaging, and those with contraindications to MRI were excluded from the study. Osteomyelitis was confirmed by tissue biopsy, whereas RBME was diagnosed by exclusion. All participants underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and ADC values were measured independently by two radiologists who were blinded to the clinical diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of ADC was then assessed. Results: A total of 45 patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) were recruited, of whom 18 (40.0%) had osteomyelitis, 16 (35.6%) had reactive bone marrow edema (RBME), and 11 (24.4%) had healthy bone tissue. Osteomyelitis demonstrated significantly higher ADC values compared to normal bone (P < 0.001) and significantly lower ADC values compared to RBME (P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of 1478.0 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, ADC differentiated osteomyelitis from RBME with an accuracy of 88.2%, sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 81.2%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.958. Conclusion: These findings support the applicability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as a non-invasive and accurate diagnostic tool for differentiating osteomyelitis from reactive bone marrow edema.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusMagnetic resonance imagingOsteomyelitisReactive bone marrow edema

Identifiers

PMID41509599
PMCPMC12777736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.