ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Assessing Knowledge Distillation of a Multi-Emitter Localizing Neural Network for Applications in Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Super Resolution Microscopy (SRM) is a powerful method in quantitative bioscience that allows interrogation of nanoscale details. These methods require extensive imaging times on the microscope resulting in data sets on the scale of gigabytes. In order to reduce imaging times, the concentration of emitters can be increased, however that results in overlapping emitters rendering the isolation of single emitters extremely difficult. Statistical methods have been developed to deconvolute overlapping emitters, however they require parameter optimization and user expertise. Recently, Machine Learning (ML) has been developed to automate this analysis but often require larger Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). While powerful, such models require compute and storage that would make pushing these models to compute limited devices difficult. To address this, we investigate if the dense multi-emitter localization capacity of a larger model, Deep Residual Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (DRL-STORM), can be transferred to a smaller model, Super Resolution Convolutional Neural Network (SRCNN). Results: Knowledge transfer from DRL-STORM to SRCNN did not result in an improvement of multi-emitter localization performance of SRCNN. Hint Learning (HL) was performed to facilitate knowledge transfer in a more deliberate manner. SRCNN demonstrated a limited capacity to learn an intermediate representation of the input image in the same manner as DRL-STORM and resultantly did not perform any better in its task. Conclusions: Knowledge transfer was not successful between DRL-STORM and SRCNN, but evidence suggests that it is possible and may require another model besides SRCNN. A future work will investigate if hyper-parameter optimization results in greater knowledge distillation between DRL-STORM and SRCNN. SRCNN may not be ideal for multi-emitter localizations, but it can still prove effective for SRM data analysis at emitter concentrations typical of SRM experiments and is uniquely suited as a neural network model that can be deployed in compute limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.