Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509185›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Managing missing MUKEYs in the QSWAT+ SSURGO database.

Mahesh R Tapas, Asmita Murumkar, Chris George, Brian Brandt, Jay Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahesh R TapasDepartment of Extension, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Asmita MurumkarDepartment of Extension, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.
Chris GeorgeTexas A&M Texas A&M AgriLife, 3127 TAMU, College Station, TX USA.
Brian BrandtAmrican Farmland Trust.
Jay MartinDepartment of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool Plus (SWAT+) is a widely used hydrological model for simulating water flow, sediment transport, and the impacts of land management on watersheds. It relies on soil data to represent how soil properties influence water movement, nutrient cycling, and crop growth within a watershed. The Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database provides detailed, high-resolution soil information essential for such modeling. However, a common challenge arises when missing (Map Unit Keys) in the SWAT+ SSURGO database prevents the creation of Hydrological Response Units (HRUs), effectively halting model development. This study presents a method using QGIS to resolve missing MUKEY issues. Specifically, we demonstrate the use of QGIS's Eliminate Selected Polygons tool with the "Largest Common Boundary" option to merge missing MUKEY polygons, maintaining spatial coherence and enabling HRU generation. This approach simplifies the workflow, reduces manual effort, and improves model readiness and accuracy.•The study presents a method for resolving missing MUKEYs in the QSWAT+ SSURGO database, facilitating further development of SWAT+ and minimizing manual errors.•QSWAT+ version 3.0.2 improves error reporting by listing missing MUKEYs in the QGIS log, simplifying troubleshooting.•Using QGIS's Eliminate Selected Polygons tool with the "Largest Common Boundary" option preserves spatial integrity while addressing missing data gaps.

Indexed as

Geographic information systems (GIS)Geospatial data processingHydrological modelingHydrological response units (HRUs)Missing MUKEYsSoil Data ManagementSpatial Data IntegritySSURGO DatabaseSWAT+ ApplicationsWatershed Modeling

Identifiers

PMID41509185
PMCPMC12775854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.