ArticleMethodsX2026
BioMedStatX - Statistical workflows for reliable biomedical data analysis.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment of a 3D Multicellular HCC Tumor Spheroid Model to Unravel Nrf2's Influence on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robust statistical analysis is essential for scientific validity and to ensure good scientific practice. Yet many researchers, especially in biomedical fields, struggle with checking assumptions, selecting the correct tests, and interpreting results. These obstacles can lead to misleading conclusions and undermine scientific progress. BioMedStatX explicitly addresses these issues by ensuring that the implemented workflows exclude the use of inadequate statistical tests. This Python-based desktop application features an intuitive graphical interface that automatically selects appropriate statistical tests based on the data and its characteristics, ensuring that users, even with minor statistical training, follow a statistically valid workflow. Users can import Excel or CSV files, select groups and let BioMedStatX manage the rest: from outlier detection, assumption checks and guided data transformations to test execution (parametric or non-parametric) and guided post-hoc analyses. Results are exported in a structured Excel workbook including a decision tree that visualizes each analytical step, and customizable plots are exported as SVG-/PNG-files. By embedding statistical expertise directly into the software, BioMedStatX prevents invalid analysis paths, increases transparency, and enables reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.