ReviewGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026
Synergistic Strategies in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Review in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic and therapeutic implications of PSMD14 in hepatocellular carcinoma: an integrative analysis of transcriptomic and single-cell profiles.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- γ-terpinene inhibits the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway mediated glycolysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound contrast in predicting the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A Prognostic Risk Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Integrating Ferroptosis and Metabolic Reprogramming Signatures.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Synergistic Strategies in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the most prevalent primary liver cancer, characterized by alarmingly high mortality rates and low five-year survival outcomes. A significant challenge in HCC management lies in its advanced-stage treatment, with most cases identified at advanced, unresectable stages, resulting in poor prognoses and limited treatment options. Over the last decade, considerable advancements have been made in systemic treatment strategies, notably with the introduction of multi-kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib and lenvatinib, which have redefined the therapeutic landscape for advanced HCC. The emergence of immunotherapy has further revolutionized first-line treatment, bringing new hope with agents like the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and the CTLA-4 inhibitor tremelimumab. Moreover, combination regimens such as atezolizumab plus bevacizumab have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, leading to substantial improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, clinical trial outcomes remain suboptimal. Key challenges persist in the selection and sequencing of therapies, the development of more diversified combination strategies, and the implementation of downstaging approaches for advanced HCC. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current progress in systemic therapies for HCC, drawing on extensive research findings and clinical trial data to assess their clinical applications and explore potential challenges. By offering a critical analysis of these therapeutic strategies, this paper seeks to furnish valuable insights and references for ongoing research and future clinical practice, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes in HCC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.