Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509154›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Green talent management as a driver of public sector well-being: insights from civil servants' job satisfaction in China.

Mi Zhou, Biying Wang, Rumeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mi ZhouSchool of Public Administration, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China.
Biying WangSchool of Public Administration, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China.
Rumeng ZhangSchool of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Enhancing public service quality and societal well-being increasingly relies on the strategic development of human capital within the public sector. Although green talent management (GTM) has been widely applied to promote sustainability and performance in for-profit organizations, its mechanisms and effects in public administration remain insufficiently examined. This study investigates how GTM influences civil servants' job satisfaction, highlighting the roles of green organizational identity and artificial intelligence (AI). Methods: Data were collected from 347 civil servants in China's public administration sector using a structured survey. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to test the mediating effect of green organizational identity and the moderating effect of AI. Results: Both green hard talent management and green soft talent management significantly enhanced civil servants' job satisfaction. Green organizational identity mediated these relationships. In addition, AI moderated the effect of green hard talent management on green organizational identity. Discussion: The findings offer empirical evidence that GTM contributes to improving job satisfaction by strengthening organizational identity among public sector employees. They further suggest that AI can amplify certain GTM effects, providing deeper insight into how sustainability-oriented talent practices can support human capital development and public sector modernization.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecivil servantgreen organizational identitygreen talent managementjob satisfaction and public administrationpublic sector

Identifiers

PMID41509154
PMCPMC12776628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.