ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
The efficacy of
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut dysbiosis and constipation in patients with end-stage renal disease: pathogenic associations and therapeutic interventions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Chronic constipation (CC) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on CKD patients with CC referred to nephrology clinics of Babol University of Medical Sciences in 2022-23.They were examined by a nephrologist and 66 patients were randomly allocated into two groups, receiving CFS or lactulose, with the same dosage (30 ml/day) for 2 weeks. Patients were visited in the 1 Results: In the CFS group, defecation frequency per week and daily (primary outcome) improved significantly compared to the lactulose group (p-Value=0.01).As secondary outcomes, the percent of straining, lumpy stools and stool hardness in the CFS group was significantly better than the lactulose (p <0.05). In the CFS group, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p-Value=0.045) and creatinine (Cr) (p =0.01) decreased after the intervention significantly. PAC-QOL showed significant improvements in subscales and total scores in the CFS group compared to the lactulose group (p<0.001). Conclusion: This is the first trial that evaluated CFS on CC in CKD patients, and monitored the changes in laboratory factors levels. CFS demonstrates greater efficacy than lactulose in managing CC among CKD patients. PAC-QOL was greatly better in CFS group rather than lactulose group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.