ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Predicting acute stress recovery: A resilience index of physiological responses to Trier Social Stress Test.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated brain and body mechanisms underlying acute stress and trauma-related vulnerability.Neurobiology of stress · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous theoretical and empirical research has highlighted the predictive utility of different physiological reactivity and recovery patterns during acute stress for long-term mental health outcomes. Timely identification of mental health risk can be achieved by integrating these multiple temporal responses to characterize adaptive, dynamic resilience factors and then generating a resilience index. This study aimed to generate a resilience index to characterize the adaptive and dynamic resilient physiological responses and identify the predictors of these responses from a wide array of candidate predictors of psychological resilience in previous studies. Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was used to induce acute stress responses in a sample of 248 participants (56.0 % female). Principal component analyses (PCA) were employed to integrate cortisol and cardiovascular responses to the TSST. The resilience index, comprising of the PCA reactivity and recovery scores, was related to better mental health. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, 25 of the 48 predictors were identified as critical ones, including baseline physiological activity, coping and emotion regulation strategies (e.g., positive reappraisal and instrumental support seeking), positive affective style and emotional reactivity, cognitive functions (e.g., interference inhibition), and demographic factors (e.g., minor medical conditions) (absolute magnitude of coefficients=0.402-3.865). These findings highlighted the importance of considering stress reactivity and recovery and physiological stress responses to understand the resilience factors, offering significant insight into developing wearable cognitive behavioral adjustment protocols to promote recovery from stress and hence mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.