ArticlePlant direct2026
Membranous Interacting Partners of Phage-Type Plastid RNA Polymerase Have Limited Impact on Plastid Gene Expression During Chloroplast Development.
Article in Plant direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vascular plants, genes in the plastid genome are transcribed by two types of RNA polymerases, namely, phage-type nuclear-encoded and bacterial-type plastid-encoded plastid RNA polymerases (NEP and PEP, respectively). Eudicots, including Arabidopsis, carry two isoforms of NEP, RPOTp and RPOTmp. NEPs transcribe multiple plastid-encoded genes including subunits of PEP and translocon and are thus indispensable for the maintenance of plastids. However, regulatory mechanisms of NEPs are largely unknown. RPOTmp transcribes the 16S rRNA gene from a specific promoter in the seeds during vernalization, and its mutation in Arabidopsis retards chloroplast development. As interacting partners of RPOTmp, two NEP-INTERACTING PROTEINs (NIP1 and NIP2) have been identified and suggested to suppress RPOTmp activity by tethering RPOTmp to the thylakoid membrane during chloroplast development in the presence of light, but their precise roles in transcriptional regulation remain to be addressed. From these previous reports, we hypothesize that the functions of RPOTmp would depend on the light conditions and expression of NIPs. To gain insight into how RPOTmp is controlled, we performed a functional analysis of RPOTmp and NIPs using Arabidopsis mutants during germination in the dark and de-etiolation processes under light. We found that RPOTmp-dependent transcription of 16S rRNA is active in imbibed seeds and remains at a basal level throughout the postgermination processes, regardless of light conditions. We also demonstrated a limited impact of NIPs on RPOTmp function during these processes. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that NIPs have distinct evolutionary profiles compared with RPOTmp, and Arabidopsis is unlikely to have additional NIP-like proteins in plastids. Based on these findings, we propose a modified model of RPOTmp regulation during chloroplast development: RPOTmp activity remains stable throughout the process of chloroplast differentiation and is unaffected by light and NIPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.