Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41509049›Full record

ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Regorafenib's Effectiveness and Safety in the Treatment of Bone Sarcoma.

Mohsen Rahmanian, Sara Khoropanah, Sepehr Hosseinzadeh Moghaddam, Abulfazl Vatankhah, Elaheh Abdi Bastamie, Soheila Roashanzamir, Amir Rahmanian Sharifabad, Reza Ganji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohsen RahmanianSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Sara KhoropanahSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Sepehr Hosseinzadeh MoghaddamSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Abulfazl VatankhahSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Elaheh Abdi BastamieIsfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Soheila RoashanzamirSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Amir Rahmanian SharifabadSchool of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Reza GanjiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Bone sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited systemic options in advanced stages. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its efficacy and safety in bone sarcomas using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for RCTs published from September 27, 2012, to October 14, 2024. After removing duplicates, 350 records were screened, and five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed with a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using I² statistics. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1. Results: A total of 350 records were screened after duplicate removal, of which 339 were excluded based on title and abstract. Eleven full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and six were excluded for not meeting RCT criteria, resulting in five RCTs being included. Most had metastatic disease at baseline. Regorafenib significantly improved PFS (MD = 9.69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.54-14.84; I² = 0%), with no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit (MD = 0.85 weeks; 95% CI: -36.33 to 38.02; I² = 0%). These findings were consistent across studies and histological subtypes. All pooled analyses demonstrated zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%), indicating highly consistent treatment effects among trials. No significant between-group heterogeneity was observed in subgroup analyses, confirming that regorafenib's benefit on progression-free survival was stable across different bone sarcoma types. Common regorafenib-related AEs included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, fatigue, and diarrhea. Grade 3-5 events were mostly hypertension and pain, generally manageable with dose modifications. Safety results were also consistent across studies, showing zero or near-zero heterogeneity (I² = 0%) and no significant subgroup differences, indicating a homogeneous safety profile across sarcoma subtypes. Conclusion: Regorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcomas across multiple subtypes, with a manageable toxicity profile. These results support its use as a novel therapy and highlight the need for future trials focused on optimizing dosing and patient selection. .

Indexed as

Bone sarcomaMeta-analysisOncologyPFSRCTRegorafenibTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID41509049
PMCPMC12777697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.