ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
The Mobile Applications for Low Back and Neck Pain Therapy: App Review.
Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess mobile applications (apps) designed for physiotherapy targeting low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). The study employed an evaluation design, in which three reviewers conducted searches in English and Persian on Google Play in October 2024 to identify apps related to LBP and NP. After initial screening, the included apps were downloaded and installed on smartphones for further evaluation. The MARS questionnaire was utilized to evaluate apps. The total score obtained from the MARS questionnaire, along with the rating on the Google Play Store, was used to assess the quality and effectiveness of the apps. Eighteen apps, consisting of eight for NP and ten for LBP, were included in this study. Among LBP apps, the application "Back Pain Relief Exercises at Home" received the highest score (3.79/5). Moreover, the app "Lia - AI Posture Trainer" achieved the highest score among NP apps at 4.25/5. The findings showed that the apps available for NP and LBP are limited and low-quality. Given the increasing number of individuals suffering from these conditions, there is a clear need for up-to-date and high-quality software to provide daily patient support. These apps must be developed based on scientific studies and incorporate user feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.