Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41508901›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026

Oral rehydration solution for the management of fluid and electrolyte disturbances in patients with an ileostomy: A scoping review.

Austin J Hoeg, Jessica Jaques, Remy Johnson, Megan Kocher, Alexa Weingarden, Byron Vaughn, Alexander Khoruts, Cyrus Jahansouz, Ryan T Hurt, Levi M Teigen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Austin J HoegSchool of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-1560
Jessica JaquesMedical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Remy JohnsonMedical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Megan KocherUniversity of Minnesota Libraries, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-5144
Alexa WeingardenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Byron VaughnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Alexander KhorutsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Cyrus JahansouzDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ryan T HurtDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Levi M TeigenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-0485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ileostomy creation is common among patients with colorectal cancer, diverticulitis, and inflammatory bowel disease. Surgical removal or diversion of the colon can result in nutrition complications, most notably dehydration-a leading cause of hospital readmission-and increased risk of kidney injury. Existing studies on fluid and electrolyte management after ileostomy largely focus on short bowel syndrome or high-output stomas, overlooking the physiological implications of ileostomy creation, even in patients with normal output. Given the absence of standardized oral rehydration protocols and limited interventional data, a scoping review was conducted to map the current evidence on oral rehydration solutions for postoperative fluid and electrolyte management in adults without short bowel syndrome or high-output stoma. Comprehensive searches across five databases identified 5738 articles, of which 6 met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies examined adults with ileostomy for any standard indication in which oral rehydration solution use was a study objective. The included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, encompassing randomized controlled, crossover, double-blinded comparator, retrospective cohort, and qualitative designs. Collectively, available evidence supports a pivotal role for oral rehydration solutions in both short-term and long-term management after ileostomy, improving hydration and reducing complications. This review highlights the need for standardized, evidence-based oral rehydration regimens and underscores opportunities to reduce postoperative morbidity, kidney injury, and hospital readmissions while optimizing long-term outcomes in this growing patient population.

Indexed as

DehydrationFluid TherapyIleostomyPostoperative ComplicationsRehydration SolutionsWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceHumansWater-Electrolyte BalanceRehydration Solutionselectrolytes/acid‐baseenteral formulasenteral nutritionfluidsgastroenterologyGI accessinternal medicinenutritionnutrition support practicenutrition support teamsoutcomes research/qualityrenal diseaseresearch and diseasessurgery

Identifiers

PMID41508901
PMCPMC13047308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.