Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41508874›Full record

ReviewDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2026

Residual gaze behaviour during navigation in blindness and low vision.

Junchi Feng, Fernanda Garcia-Piña, Mahya Beheshti, Todd E Hudson, William Seiple, John-Ross Rizzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junchi FengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Fernanda Garcia-PiñaLighthouse Guild, New York, NY, USA.
Mahya BeheshtiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Todd E HudsonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
William SeipleLighthouse Guild, New York, NY, USA.
John-Ross RizzoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

VIS4ION-Thailand (Visually Impaired Smart Service System for Spatial Intelligence and Onboard Navigation) - Resub - 1R21EY033689 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RIZZO, JOHN ROSS, VEDANTHAN, RAJESH · 2021 to 2022
$358k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutdoor navigation poses significant challenges for people with blindness or low vision, yet the role of gaze behaviour in supporting mobility remains underexplored. Fully sighted individuals typically adopt consistent scanning strategies, whereas those with visual impairments rely on heterogeneous adaptations shaped by residual vision and experience.

methodsWe conducted a comparative eye-tracking study of fully sighted, low vision, blind, and fully blind participants navigating outdoor routes. Using a wearable eye tracker, we quantified fixation counts, fixation rate, fixation area, direction, peak fixation location, and walking speed.

resultsWalking speed declined systematically with worsening vision. Fixation count increased with greater impairment, reflecting slower travel times and more frequent sampling. Fixation rate differed across groups, though between-group differences were generally not significant between most groups. Fixation spatial coverage decreased along the continuum of vision loss. Fixation patterns were most consistent in the fully sighted group. Peak fixation locations were centred in fully sighted participants but shifted outward and became more variable with impairment.

conclusionGaze strategies during navigation form a graded continuum across vision groups, with fully sighted and fully blind participants at opposite poles and low vision and blind groups spanning the middle. Visual acuity alone does not predict functional gaze use, as rehabilitation experience and adaptive strategies strongly shape behaviour. These findings highlight the need for personalised rehabilitation and assistive technologies, with residual gaze patterns offering insight into mobility capacity and training opportunities for safer navigation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONDistinct Residual Vision Patterns: This research reveals that residual vision patterns differ significantly, with fully sighted individuals exhibiting a consistent fixation pattern while low vision participants show more varied strategies during navigation.Highly Individualised Gaze Behaviours: Low vision participants demonstrate highly individualised gaze behaviours, indicating that a one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate for effective rehabilitation.Tailored Assistive Solutions: Assistive technologies and rehabilitation programs should be designed to address these unique, individualised needs, providing personalised feedback and training to enhance mobility and safety.

Indexed as

BlindnessFixation, OcularSpatial NavigationVision, LowAdultAgedEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with Visual DisabilitiesWalkingeye trackinggaze behaviournavigationPeople with blindness and low visionresidual vision

Identifiers

PMID41508874
PMCPMC12874777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.