ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
An investigation of the sound of foam and its potential influence on the shampoo experience.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCompared to at-home hair washing, the salon shampooing experience offers a different sensory landscape for the client. Visual and tactile interaction with the shampoo foam itself is minimized, thereby emphasizing the olfactory, tactile (scalp) and auditory dimensions of the experience. This sensory shift presents a novel opportunity to investigate the impact of the often-overlooked aspects of the hair washing experience, especially shampoo foaming auditory perception.
methodsThe present study uses binaural recording techniques to explore the sound of shampoo foam from the perspective of a person whose hair is being washed (salon context). It is designed to answer the question of whether participants can differentiate different shampoo foam sounds and to quantify acoustic differences among the foam sounds. It then examines the emotional and functional implications this has for the shampooing experience. In addition, a combined approach including psychoacoustic analysis of the foaming sound, free listing and Check-all-that-apply tests has been employed to ascertain the functional and emotional connotations perceived by participants.
resultsThe results show that participants can differentiate different sounds, and that these different sounds form clusters based on their acoustic, emotional and functional profiles. The initial phase of lathering tends to be a separate cluster, more linked to high arousal and negative emotions, whereas later phases tend to be more positive. Different shampoos also show different functional and emotional evocations.
conclusionIn sum, the results suggest that the sound of shampoo foam has the potential to (1) affect a salon customer's hair washing experience, (2) serve as an effective tool for marketing and even (3) influence the design of the shampoo or salon service itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.