ArticleThe world journal of men's health2026
Machine Learning Evaluation of Semen Analysis Could Reveal New Infertility-Related Markers: A Pilot Study.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo perform a pilot study aiming at evaluating whether machine learning could be a useful model to evaluate semen analysis, improving the diagnostic work-up of male partner of infertile couples. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted using real-world data on male evaluated in routine andrological clinical practice at two Italian tertiary centers. The study utilized two distinct datasets: the first (UNIROMA) encompassed three distinct variables, including semen analysis, sex hormones, and testicular ultrasound parameters. The second dataset (UNIMORE) was constructed incorporating semen analysis, sex hormones, biochemical examinations, and parameters related to environmental pollution. The XGBoost analysis, as part of machine learning techniques, was applied separately to each dataset, as the two datasets did not share a significant overlap in terms of variables.
resultsThe UNIROMA dataset comprised 2,334 male subjects. The XGBoost analysis exhibited the highest accuracy (area under the curve [AUC], 0.987) in predicting patients with azoospermia compared to other categories. Remarkably, our analysis revealed that among the most influential predictive variables, follicle-stimulating hormone serum levels (F-score=492.0), inhibin B serum levels (F-score=261), and bitesticular volume (F-score=253.0) stood out. The UNIMORE dataset consisted of 11,981 records. The XGBoost analysis demonstrated a good predictive accuracy (AUC, 0.668), especially for identifying the azoospermia group. Notably, the most crucial predictive variables were environmental pollution parameters (PM10, F-score=361; NO₂, F-score=299) and biochemical data (white blood cells, F-score=326; red blood cells, F-score=299).
conclusionsThis pilot study applies machine learning to two extensive datasets, suggesting that changes in semen analysis may be linked to other variables, such as testicular ultrasound characteristics, red blood cell count, and environmental pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.