ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health
Facilitators and Barriers to Prenatal Exercise from the Biopsychosocial Perspective of Pregnant Individuals: "If You Keep Moving, Then You Won't Stop".
Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionExercise during pregnancy benefits maternal and fetal health, yet many pregnant individuals struggle to maintain regular physical activity. Biological, psychological, and social factors, along with structural determinants of health, shape engagement, particularly among populations historically underrepresented in prenatal exercise research.
methodsThis secondary analysis of the Prenatal Heart Smart trial examined motivational interviews from 108 pregnant individuals participating in a low-intensity exercise intervention involving walking or stretching 5 days a week during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Weekly motivational interviews evaluating importance and confidence ratings for exercise were collected on a 0 to 10 scale. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis, and quantitative data were analyzed descriptively.
resultsParticipants rated exercise as highly important (mean [SD], 8.46 [1.71]) and expressed moderate-to-high confidence in engaging in it (mean [SD], 7.70 [1.98]). Fatigue, pain, and discomfort were common barriers, whereas accessible, home-based activities supported engagement. Psychological barriers included fear of overexertion, uncertainty about safety, and fluctuating motivation, whereas intrinsic motivation, stress relief, and routine formation facilitated consistency. Social support from partners, family, and health care providers encouraged participation, although many cited limited provider guidance and competing responsibilities as challenges. Structural determinants such as work demands and neighborhood safety further shaped engagement. DISCUSSION: Exercise during pregnancy is influenced by intersecting biological, psychological, social, and structural factors. Pregnant individuals may value exercise but lack the confidence, resources, and systemic support necessary to sustain it. Interventions should extend beyond education to include culturally responsive, accessible, and community-based approaches that strengthen confidence, social support, and structural equity to promote sustainable prenatal physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.