Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41508123›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026

Impact of early versus delayed surgery on 30-day outcomes in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a single-center propensity score-matched cohort study.

Takuto Tone, Shizumasa Murata, Taiki Hayashi, Kentaro Ueda, Takafumi Yonemitsu, Tsuyoshi Nakashima, Natsuyo Shinohara, Naoaki Shibata, Yuko Okishio, Kosei Kunitatsu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Rehabilitation guidelines and specifications for traumatic spinal cord injury (2025 edition)].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Takuto ToneDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Shizumasa MurataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan. shizuman.612@gmail.com.
Taiki HayashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kentaro UedaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takafumi YonemitsuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Tsuyoshi NakashimaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Natsuyo ShinoharaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Naoaki ShibataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuko OkishioDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Kosei KunitatsuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Nozomu ShimaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Mami ShibataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yusuke KidoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yukari InadaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Tomohiro YoshimuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroshi Yamada *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Shigeaki Inoue *Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly surgical decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury has been associated with improved neurological outcomes, but because of heterogeneity across studies there is debate about the optimal timing. Multicenter investigations perhaps offer broad generalizability, but they may lack uniform perioperative management. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the association between surgical timing (within or beyond 24 h) and short-term outcomes under a standardized institutional protocol.

methodsThis study was conducted at a tertiary emergency and critical care center in Japan using a cohort of patients from between 2011 and 2024. Among 512 patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, 337 underwent surgical decompression and/or stabilization and they were included in the analysis. Patients were categorized into early (<  24 h) and delayed (≥  24 h) surgery groups. Propensity score matching was applied (1:1 nearest neighbor, caliper 0.1) using sex, age, BMI, ASA class, ASIA grade, injury level, injury severity score, cervical dislocation, and procedure type. The primary outcome was neurological improvement at 30 days (≥ 1 ASIA grade). Secondary outcomes were overall complications and respiratory complications within 30 days. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with the outcomes.

resultsBefore matching, early surgery was associated with younger age, lower injury severity scores, and more severe neurological impairment. After propensity score matching, 100 matched pairs achieved covariate balance (standardized mean differences < 0.1-0.2). Early surgery was associated with greater neurological improvement (36.0% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.044) and fewer overall complications (31.0% vs. 57.0%, p < 0.001). Respiratory complications showed a trend toward reduction (19.0% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.098). In multivariate analyses, early surgery was independently associated with neurological improvement (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.19-4.81, p = 0.014) and with reduced complications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99, p = 0.048).

conclusionsEarly surgical intervention within 24 h after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury was independently associated with improved neurological recovery and reduced short-term complications. These findings support prioritization of early decompression in institutions where surgery within 24 h is possible.

trial registrationThis study was approved by the Wakayama Medical University Institutional Review Board (Approval No. 4618).

Indexed as

Cervical spinal cord injuryComplicationsDecompressionEarly surgeryEmergency spine surgeryNeurological recoveryPropensity score matchingRespiratory complicationsTiming

Identifiers

PMID41508123
PMCPMC12882486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.